Napster And Musician Rights

Music copy near is more or lessthing that depart incessantly be in question. numerous volume believe that melody is for all to regard and should non be restricted on how we obtain it. Napster is the greatest contr oversy in the United States at current. Many unisonians and bulk believe others should shake free door to all harmony. Music is an expression of flavorings and it is an stratagem, And art is something that is there for others to observe whether it is by facial expression at it with their eyes or bear in minding to it with their ears.We prat go into a museum and take in a painting freely wherefore should we not be allowed to listen to music freely although it is air over the radio. unexclusive access to music allows people to much(prenominal) readily know what music they cull and appeals to them. The program Napster allows people to find music listen to it and find out what workman sings a particular song and listen to it. Then many of those people g o out and purchase those CDs which makes m geniusy for those rophys.Free access to music allows knowledge of parvenue bands to become more wide spread and can ontogeny the circulation and popularity of a song and a band. Napster creates an surroundings that allows people all over the States to sh ar their music with others This is no diametric from someone copying a CD for a friend so they can receive it entirely no one can withstand that just because Napster it nationwide record companies call for to control it.Many recording artist state that they are losing money because of Internet programs such as Napster. This statement made by the band Metallica states the feelings of many recording artist From sidereal day one our fight has always been to harbor the rights of artists who chose not to lead their music apply without consent.The courts decision validates this right and confirms that Napster was wrong in taking not only Metallicas music but other artists who do n ot want to be a part of the Napster dust and exploiting it without their approval. We have never objected to the technology, the Internet or the digital distribution of music. All we have ever asked is that artists be able to control how, when and in what form their creativity is distributed done these channels.These are some of the basic rights that Napster has continually refused to accept. Many musical comedy artist feel that they are being cheated because people are not paying to listen to their music. sightly like a poem some songs are not meant for the world to take and Napster puts songs all over America in stock(predicate) at the click of a button. Although Napster does bye music to be accessed by anyone it does not censor children from accessing music that contains lyrics not allow for for them. Altough parents should be responsible for obtaining programs or covering what their children are accessing online.As a musical artist myself I believe that everyone shoul d have access to all music at no cost but if you want to have that music on such as a CD you should have to pay for the artist time and feat put into making that CD you wouldnt goto work everyday if you didnt unhorse paid. Napster also allows people for all over the nation to share and introduce others to new music and who has the right to restrict the liberty and ideas of an individual who is trying to express themselves. Napster is something that will always be in argumentation as long as it live on but who will make the last decision.